Category Archives: apologetics

Does the God of the Bible measure up to his own Standard of Perfect?

Posted on March 23, 2013 by

The bible says we should judge a tree by the fruit that it bears, so for the sake of being biblically sound we will hold the biblical God to that same standard.  To determine if the God of the Bible … Continue reading →

Posted in apologetic, apologetics, atheist vs christian, bible contradictions, bible study, biblical difficulties, carm, christ, christian fraud, confusion, contradiction, debate, god, jesus, jesus the christ, jesus the messiah, laws of logic, quote, scriptural difficulties | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Why A New Covenant if the First was Perfect? Is the Law of God Perfect?

Posted on March 12, 2013 by

This all together is a confusing topic to tackle, and somewhat difficult to explain or gather because of the way people/believers interpret the law and the bible.  So in talking about God’s law we will actually be talking more about … Continue reading →

Posted in apologetic, apologetics, atheist vs christian, bible contradictions, bible study, biblical difficulties, christ, church, Common Sense, contradiction, covenant theology, creation, creationism, history, jesus the christ, jesus the messiah, King David, law, laws of logic, messiah, purpose, religion, scriptural difficulties, systematic theology, theology, youtube | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 22 Comments

Book Review: Mere Christianity By C.S. Lewis

Posted on February 7, 2013 by

This is one the most highly regarded apologetic books in history.  It is claimed to have turned atheist to Christians, and non-believers to believers.  Considering the reputation of the book, it was a must read. C.S. Lewis has a literary … Continue reading →

Posted in apologetic, apologetics, apologist, atheism, atheist, atheist vs christian, best apologist, Book Review, evil, human nature, marriage, quote | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 21 Comments

Did Apostle John and Apostle Peter write their epistles?

Posted on February 2, 2013 by

Bible Difficulty #10 Could the Apostle John & Peter read and write?  Were they illiterate? Most conservative evangelicals hold to the traditional view that both Apostle John and Apostle Peter were the original authors of their epistle, but historical and … Continue reading →

Posted in Abductive reasoning, apologetics, apostle, atheist vs christian, bart ehrman, bible contradictions, biblical difficulties, christian fraud, debate, deceived, doubt, early christian history, ehrman project, history, textual criticism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Defending your Faith-Free Life

Posted on January 21, 2013 by

Reblogged from Triangulations: Let’s start with a Bible quote and my coined definition: …Always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear; — 1 … Continue reading →

Posted in apologetic, apologetics, atheism, belief, christian faith, Free-Thought, freethinker, inspiration, philosophy, purpose, quote, reason, reasonable evidence, religion, Response, theology, unbelief | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Reasoning with Faith, Religion, and Atheism…Reductive Reasoning (Part 4)

Posted on September 7, 2012 by

Go to Main Menu or Start at the Introductory Page Reductive Reasoning Reductio ad absurdum (Latin: “reduction to the absurd“) is a form of argument in which a proposition is proven or disproven by following it sequentially to an absurd result.  Another name for this (reductive reasoning) … Continue reading →

Posted in agnostic, apologetic, apologetics, atheist, atheist vs christian, bible, bible contradictions, biblical difficulties, contradiction, god, laws of logic, logic, reason, reasoning | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Is Biblical Inerrancy, Biblical? Does Inspiration imply inerrancy?

Posted on June 16, 2012 by

Bible Difficulty #8 “Biblical inerrancy is not a doctrine that can be proven by an a posteriori deductive argument. It is a position that is accepted a priori, on faith, and not by reason. The many Biblical and historical references that support inerrancy are completely valid … Continue reading →

Posted in 2 timothy 3:16-17, apologetic, apologetics, bart ehrman, bible contradictions, biblical difficulties, biblical inerrancy, confusion, debate, deductive reasoning, Dr. William Lane Craig, early christian history, inerrancy, inspiration, John D. Woodbridge, jp moreland, reason, reasoning, scriptural difficulties, scripture, Septuagint, textual criticism, word of god, youtube | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Some Thoughts, Links, and Sources on Inerrancy and Inspiration

Posted on June 12, 2012 by

Survey of the Belief of biblical inerrancy in the U.S.: On 2007-MAY-25, Gallup reported the results of a national poll on Biblical inerrancy. Those polled were asked which of three statements comes closest to describing their personal views about the … Continue reading →

Posted in apologetics, gallup, inerrancy, infalliable, inspiration, M. James Sawyer, scriptural difficulties | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment