Tag Archives: Bart ehrman

Is the Bible, God’s Perfect Word?

Posted on March 8, 2013 by

The Question begins with, Is God’s Word Perfect?,  Is the autobiographical text perfect?,  Is God original spoken word divinely perfect?…..Well the Christian or Christian Scholar would say Yes, Of Course. “The Bible is inspired, but is it inerrant, that is without … Continue reading →

Posted in apologist, bart ehrman, bible, bible contradictions, biblical difficulties, biblical inerrancy, biblical inspiration, debate, fraud, inerrancy, infalliable, inspiration, message, scriptural difficulties, scripture, skeptic, skepticism, word of god | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Did Apostle John and Apostle Peter write their epistles?

Posted on February 2, 2013 by

Bible Difficulty #10 Could the Apostle John & Peter read and write?  Were they illiterate? Most conservative evangelicals hold to the traditional view that both Apostle John and Apostle Peter were the original authors of their epistle, but historical and … Continue reading →

Posted in Abductive reasoning, apologetics, apostle, atheist vs christian, bart ehrman, bible contradictions, biblical difficulties, christian fraud, debate, deceived, doubt, early christian history, ehrman project, history, textual criticism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Who is Bart Ehrman?

Posted on July 31, 2012 by

Who is Bart Ehrman?  And why am I making a post blog about this dude with the funny sounding last name. Well he is the world-renowned distinguished New Testament Historian at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.  Ehrmans … Continue reading →

Posted in agnostic, atheist vs christian, bart ehrman, bible, bible contradictions, biblical difficulties, confusion, debate, early christian history, ehrman project, god, message, scriptural difficulties, textual criticism, youtube | Tagged , , , , | 18 Comments

Is Biblical Inerrancy, Biblical? Does Inspiration imply inerrancy?

Posted on June 16, 2012 by

Bible Difficulty #8 “Biblical inerrancy is not a doctrine that can be proven by an a posteriori deductive argument. It is a position that is accepted a priori, on faith, and not by reason. The many Biblical and historical references that support inerrancy are completely valid … Continue reading →

Posted in 2 timothy 3:16-17, apologetic, apologetics, bart ehrman, bible contradictions, biblical difficulties, biblical inerrancy, confusion, debate, deductive reasoning, Dr. William Lane Craig, early christian history, inerrancy, inspiration, John D. Woodbridge, jp moreland, reason, reasoning, scriptural difficulties, scripture, Septuagint, textual criticism, word of god, youtube | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Jesus debate: Man vs. myth

Posted on April 9, 2012 by

Reblogged from CNN Belief Blog: By John Blake, CNN (CNN)– Timothy Freke was flipping through an old academic book when he came across a religious image that some would call obscene. It was a drawing of a third-century amulet depicting … Continue reading →

Posted in bible, christ, christian, deceived, god, jesus, jesus the christ, jesus the messiah, message | Tagged , , , | 16 Comments