Category Archives: John D. Woodbridge

Biblical Inerrancy vs. Biblical Infallibility

Definitions of infallibility differ widely. In common speech, ‘infallibility‘ can refer to a person (or a group of persons), to an act of teaching by these persons, or to the information being taught.  Infallibility is sometimes used to refer to … Continue reading

Posted in belief, biblical inerrancy, biblical inspiration, church, inerrancy, infalliable, inspiration, John D. Woodbridge, limited inerrancy, occam's razor, systematic theology, word of god | Tagged , , , , , | 10 Comments

Is Biblical Inerrancy, Biblical? Does Inspiration imply inerrancy?

Bible Difficulty #8 “Biblical inerrancy is not a doctrine that can be proven by an a posteriori deductive argument. It is a position that is accepted a priori, on faith, and not by reason. The many Biblical and historical references that support inerrancy are completely valid … Continue reading

Posted in 2 timothy 3:16-17, apologetic, apologetics, bart ehrman, bible contradictions, biblical difficulties, biblical inerrancy, confusion, debate, deductive reasoning, Dr. William Lane Craig, early christian history, inerrancy, inspiration, John D. Woodbridge, jp moreland, reason, reasoning, scriptural difficulties, scripture, Septuagint, textual criticism, word of god, youtube | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The History of Inerrancy

“The doctrine of the inspiration of Scripture does not stand in the relationship of a priori but a posteriori in our theology. The doctrine of verbal inspiration is not the basis of our systematic theology and is not the major … Continue reading

Posted in biblical difficulties, biblical inerrancy, biblical inspiration, christian faith, confusion, early christian history, founding fathers, god, inerrancy, infalliable, inspiration, jesus the christ, John D. Woodbridge, scriptural difficulties, scripture, Septuagint | Tagged , , , , , | 7 Comments