-
Recent Posts
Archives
- August 2014 (1)
- May 2014 (2)
- March 2014 (1)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (3)
- December 2013 (4)
- November 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (3)
- September 2013 (8)
- August 2013 (10)
- July 2013 (5)
- June 2013 (10)
- May 2013 (7)
- April 2013 (9)
- March 2013 (7)
- February 2013 (11)
- January 2013 (10)
- December 2012 (10)
- November 2012 (8)
- October 2012 (7)
- September 2012 (12)
- August 2012 (10)
- July 2012 (12)
- June 2012 (22)
- May 2012 (14)
- April 2012 (8)
- March 2012 (8)
- February 2012 (2)
- October 2011 (1)
- September 2011 (5)
- August 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (4)
Top Posts & Pages
- What are the Different Types of Reasoning?
- Where did the people come from after Adam and Eve? Where did Cain find his wife?
- Why A New Covenant if the First was Perfect? Is the Law of God Perfect?
- Top Christian Apologist
- The Genesis 6:3 Problem?
- Why are the Gospels written in THIRD Person?
- Daniel Everett's Deconversion
- Did Apostle John and Apostle Peter write their epistles?
- The draw of an Evangelistic service.
- The History of Inerrancy
The BitterSweet Category
Tag Archives: Daniel Dennett
Book Review: God is Not Great, How Religion Poisons Everything By Christopher Hitchens
I bought this book, because during a speech by Daniel Dennett he mentioned in his research on de-conversions that this Book, God is Not Great was a major catalyst for some pastors and preachers to de-convert. And for some it was … Continue reading →
Posted in agnostic, atheism, atheist, attributes of God, bible, christian faith, christian fraud, christian history, debate, early christian history, fallacious reasoning, Free-Thought, freedom, god, human nature, message, reasonable evidence, reasoning, religion, scientist
|
Tagged Abrahamic religions, Atheist, Book Review, buddhism, Christianity, Christopher Hitchens, community, Daniel Dennett, Deism, early church history, God, God Is Not Great, islam, judaism, Judeo-Christian, Mere Christianity, morality, New Testament, Paganism, religion, Religion and Spirituality, Scientific skepticism, secularism, skepticism
|
21 Comments
